In partnership with

Visa Hit by US Anti-trust Lawsuit 💳

Hey there! 👋

There are some things money can’t buy. For everything else, Visa allegedly charges a bit too much — according to the DOJ. The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has initiated a lawsuit against Visa, accusing the global payment giant of engaging in monopolistic practices within the U.S. debit card market.

Let’s dive into what happened, how this affects businesses, and how law firms could be involved.

Don't have time for the full scoop? No worries, we've got you covered with a quick summary: click here

What did Visa do? 🤨

The legal action centres on Visa’s dominant position in the US debit card market, where it controls over 60% of transactions. The DOJ alleges that Visa has leveraged this market power to engage in anti-competitive practices, resulting in merchant fees totalling more than $7 billion annually.

Visa has also allegedly imposed restrictive conditions on merchants by effectively blocking access to lower-cost payment networks. Not only does this stifle competition, but it also suppresses innovation in the fintech sector. This hinders the growth of potential rivals like PayPal, Square, and Apple Pay. Furthermore, Visa is accused of cementing its dominance through exclusionary agreements with banks and merchants, effectively penalising those attempting to switch to competitor networks.

Visa rejects these claims, deeming the lawsuit “baseless,” asserting that it disregards the competitive landscape shaped by fintech growth, and positioning Visa as merely one player in a dynamic market.

What Visa’s Legal Battle Means for Businesses? 📊

It is crucial to understand that this case is part of a broader antitrust initiative led by the DOJ under the Biden administration, which has intensified its focus on curbing monopolistic practices across various industries. Recent high-profile cases against Google, Apple, and Ticketmaster underscore the administration’s commitment to addressing corporate consolidation, innovation stifling, and consumer protection.

The case's outcome could have far-reaching consequences for the payments industry. If successful, the DOJ could lead to significant structural reforms in how debit card networks function, potentially fostering greater competition and lowering costs for merchants. However, the litigation is likely to be protracted, with Visa set to mount a strong defence.

For businesses, particularly those dependent on debit card transactions, the case could offer significant relief through reduced fees, potentially improving profit margins. However, many may adopt a cautious approach in forming new partnerships with payment providers until the lawsuit's resolution.

How could law firms be involved? ⚖️

In Visa’s antitrust lawsuit, several law firm departments would be integral to the case.

The Antitrust and Competition Law Department would spearhead the defence, focusing on Visa’s practices under antitrust legislation such as the Sherman Act. Their job would be to prove that Visa’s practices aren’t anticompetitive and its actions benefit consumers and overall market competition.

Additionally, if the case triggers related lawsuits from affected businesses or consumers, class action lawyers may also become involved.

Furthermore, the Corporate or Mergers & Acquisitions Department could be needed if the lawsuit’s outcome necessitates structural changes in Visa’s business, such as divestitures or modifications to its agreements with financial institutions.

🤝 Together with 1440 MEDIA…

Receive Honest News Today

Join over 4 million Americans who start their day with 1440 – your daily digest for unbiased, fact-centric news. From politics to sports, we cover it all by analyzing over 100 sources. Our concise, 5-minute read lands in your inbox each morning at no cost. Experience news without the noise; let 1440 help you make up your own mind. Sign up now and invite your friends and family to be part of the informed.

Sign up today!

🗞 Other news…

Telegram will now share user data with authorities 💻

Telegram has announced that it will begin sharing certain user data with authorities in response to legal warrants and requests. This change reportedly includes providing users' IP addresses and phone numbers when required by law. This change follows the arrest of Telegram CEO Pavel Durov, who was accused of enabling criminal activities on the platform, including the sharing of child abuse images. This change reportedly includes providing users' IP addresses and phone numbers when required by law.

New fraud compensation rules 💰

The UK Payment System Regulator has announced changes to the fraud reimbursement scheme. Coming into effect from 7th October, affected individuals can expect to be reimbursed within five business days of making their claim. The maximum compensation of £415,000 has also been reduced to £85,000.

I hope you enjoyed this article. See you next week! 👋

Written by Sana Feroz